On 16/05/2025 08:34, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
This should be 689 yes
---
bod
Hi Bryan,Konrad,
I confirmed that the value is 688 instead of 689. The documentation incorrectly listed it as 689. To CC linux-media, I have resent the patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250516072707.388332-1- quic_wenmliu@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Do you mean the documentation in the kernel or the documentation inside of qcom ?
I checked the internal silicon definition, I think Konrad did also.
Which documentation do you mean here ?
---
bod