[PATCH v3 3/5] mm/shmem: Fix potential dead loop in shmem_unuse()

From: Kemeng Shi
Date: Fri May 16 2025 - 04:16:24 EST


If multi shmem_unuse() for different swap type is called concurrently,
a dead loop could occur as following:
shmem_unuse(typeA) shmem_unuse(typeB)
mutex_lock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex)
list_for_each_entry_safe(info, next, ...)
...
mutex_unlock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex)
/* info->swapped may drop to 0 */
shmem_unuse_inode(&info->vfs_inode, type)

mutex_lock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex)
list_for_each_entry(info, next, ...)
if (!info->swapped)
list_del_init(&info->swaplist)

...
mutex_unlock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex)

mutex_lock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex)
/* iterate with offlist entry and encounter a dead loop */
next = list_next_entry(info, swaplist);
...

Restart the iteration if the inode is already off shmem_swaplist list
to fix the issue.

Fixes: b56a2d8af9147 ("mm: rid swapoff of quadratic complexity")
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/shmem.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 495e661eb8bb..aeeddf612baa 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1505,6 +1505,7 @@ int shmem_unuse(unsigned int type)
return 0;

mutex_lock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex);
+start_over:
list_for_each_entry_safe(info, next, &shmem_swaplist, swaplist) {
if (!info->swapped) {
list_del_init(&info->swaplist);
@@ -1523,13 +1524,15 @@ int shmem_unuse(unsigned int type)
cond_resched();

mutex_lock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex);
- next = list_next_entry(info, swaplist);
- if (!info->swapped)
- list_del_init(&info->swaplist);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&info->stop_eviction))
wake_up_var(&info->stop_eviction);
if (error)
break;
+ if (list_empty(&info->swaplist))
+ goto start_over;
+ next = list_next_entry(info, swaplist);
+ if (!info->swapped)
+ list_del_init(&info->swaplist);
}
mutex_unlock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex);

--
2.30.0