Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] dt-bindings: serial: describe SA8255p

[Praveen Talari]

Hi Krzysztof

Gentle reminder!!

On 5/9/2025 10:02 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thank for you review and valuable inputs.
>
> On 5/8/2025 11:15 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof
> >
> > Thank you for your patience. I consider your inputs as valuable 
> > learning.
> >
> > On 5/6/2025 11:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 06/05/2025 20:02, Praveen Talari wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    enum:
> > > > +      - qcom,sa8255p-geni-uart
> > > > +      - qcom,sa8255p-geni-debug-uart
> > > > +
> > > > +  reg:
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > +  interrupts:
> > > > +    minItems: 1
> > > Nothing changed here, this should be dropped based on previous 
> > > discussion.
> > >
> > > You sent this v5 on 8:02 PM of my time. *THEN* you responded to my
> > > comment at v4 at 8:05 PM. That's the way to waste everyone's time.
> > >
> > > I do not understand why interrupt is optional for a new, complete 
> > > device
> > > description.
>
> To put it simply, because we are using the RX GPIO line as wake up IRQ 
> and not all SE related pins are mapped in the PDC,
>
> there is no specific wake-up pin to define. Therefore, the wake-up IRQ 
> should be considered optional.

I hope this response has addressed your query.

Thanks,

Praveen

> Thanks,
>
> Praveen
>
> > On this platform, there is no use case of waking up UART, so we 
> > consider the  wake up IRQ as optional.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Praveen
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof