Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g057: Add GBETH nodes
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu May 08 2025 - 11:01:39 EST
Hi Prabhakar,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 22:55, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC is equipped with 2x Synopsys DesignWare Ethernet
> Quality-of-Service IP block version 5.20. Add GBETH nodes to R9A09G057
> RZ/V2H(P) SoC DTSI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> @@ -701,6 +701,200 @@ sdhi2_vqmmc: vqmmc-regulator {
> status = "disabled";
> };
> };
> +
> + eth0: ethernet@15c30000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-gbeth", "renesas,rzv2h-gbeth",
> + "snps,dwmac-5.20";
> + reg = <0 0x15c30000 0 0x10000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 765 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 767 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 766 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 772 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 773 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 774 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 745 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
775?
> + <GIC_SPI 768 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 769 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 770 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 771 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-names = "macirq", "eth_wake_irq", "eth_lpi",
> + "rx-queue-0", "rx-queue-1", "rx-queue-2",
> + "rx-queue-3", "tx-queue-0", "tx-queue-1",
> + "tx-queue-2", "tx-queue-3";
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbd>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbc>,
> + <&cpg CPG_CORE R9A09G057_GBETH_0_CLK_PTP_REF_I>,
> + <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xb8>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xb9>,
> + <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xba>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbb>;
> + clock-names = "stmmaceth", "pclk", "ptp_ref",
> + "tx", "rx", "tx-180", "rx-180";
> + resets = <&cpg 0xb0>;
power-domains = <&cpg>;
> + snps,multicast-filter-bins = <256>;
> + snps,perfect-filter-entries = <128>;
> + rx-fifo-depth = <8192>;
> + tx-fifo-depth = <8192>;
> + snps,fixed-burst;
> + snps,no-pbl-x8;
> + snps,force_thresh_dma_mode;
> + snps,axi-config = <&stmmac_axi_setup>;
> + snps,mtl-rx-config = <&mtl_rx_setup0>;
> + snps,mtl-tx-config = <&mtl_tx_setup0>;
> + snps,txpbl = <32>;
> + snps,rxpbl = <32>;
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + mtl_rx_setup0: rx-queues-config {
> + snps,rx-queues-to-use = <4>;
> + snps,rx-sched-sp;
Any specific reason the first instance has this property, while the
second has not?
> + eth1: ethernet@15c40000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-gbeth", "renesas,rzv2h-gbeth",
> + "snps,dwmac-5.20";
> + reg = <0 0x15c40000 0 0x10000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 780 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 782 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 781 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 787 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 788 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 789 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 790 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 783 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 784 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 785 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 786 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-names = "macirq", "eth_wake_irq", "eth_lpi",
> + "rx-queue-0", "rx-queue-1", "rx-queue-2",
> + "rx-queue-3", "tx-queue-0", "tx-queue-1",
> + "tx-queue-2", "tx-queue-3";
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xc3>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xc2>,
> + <&cpg CPG_CORE R9A09G057_GBETH_1_CLK_PTP_REF_I>,
> + <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbe>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbf>,
> + <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xc0>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xc1>;
> + clock-names = "stmmaceth", "pclk", "ptp_ref",
> + "tx", "rx", "tx-180", "rx-180";
> + resets = <&cpg 0xb1>;
power-domains = <&cpg>;
> + snps,multicast-filter-bins = <256>;
> + snps,perfect-filter-entries = <128>;
> + rx-fifo-depth = <8192>;
> + tx-fifo-depth = <8192>;
> + snps,fixed-burst;
> + snps,no-pbl-x8;
> + snps,force_thresh_dma_mode;
> + snps,axi-config = <&stmmac_axi_setup>;
> + snps,mtl-rx-config = <&mtl_rx_setup1>;
> + snps,mtl-tx-config = <&mtl_tx_setup1>;
> + snps,txpbl = <32>;
> + snps,rxpbl = <32>;
> + status = "disabled";
The rest LGTM.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds