linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the loongarch tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Sun May 04 2025 - 23:57:16 EST
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S
between commit:
d62879a8b16c ("LoongArch: Enable HAVE_ARCH_STACKLEAK")
from the loongarch tree and commit:
7ace1602abf2 ("LoongArch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S
index 77f6fb9146a2,2abc29e57381..000000000000
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S
@@@ -78,25 -77,21 +78,23 @@@ SYM_CODE_START(handle_syscall
SYM_CODE_END(handle_syscall)
_ASM_NOKPROBE(handle_syscall)
- SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_fork)
+ SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_fork_asm)
UNWIND_HINT_REGS
- bl schedule_tail # a0 = struct task_struct *prev
- move a0, sp
- bl syscall_exit_to_user_mode
+ move a1, sp
+ bl ret_from_fork
+ STACKLEAK_ERASE
RESTORE_STATIC
RESTORE_SOME
RESTORE_SP_AND_RET
- SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_fork)
+ SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_fork_asm)
- SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_kernel_thread)
+ SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_kernel_thread_asm)
UNWIND_HINT_REGS
- bl schedule_tail # a0 = struct task_struct *prev
- move a0, s1
- jirl ra, s0, 0
- move a0, sp
- bl syscall_exit_to_user_mode
+ move a1, sp
+ move a2, s0
+ move a3, s1
+ bl ret_from_kernel_thread
+ STACKLEAK_ERASE
RESTORE_STATIC
RESTORE_SOME
RESTORE_SP_AND_RET
Attachment:
pgpTvZ2lY6shq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature