Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/204] 6.6.89-rc1 review

From: Ron Economos
Date: Wed Apr 30 2025 - 20:27:51 EST


On 4/30/25 10:59, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.89 release.
There are 204 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu, 01 May 2025 16:10:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.89-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Following two build regressions found one on riscv and s390.

1)
Regressions on riscv build with allyesconfig and allmodconfig with toolchains
gcc-13 and clang-20 failed on stable-rc 6.6.89-rc1.

* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig

Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes

Build regression: riscv uprobes.c error unused variable 'start'

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build error riscv
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
| ^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

This warning is caused by not having the fixup patch "riscv: Replace function-like macro by static inline function" upstream commit 121f34341d396b666d8a90b24768b40e08ca0d61 in 6.6.89-rc1, 6.1.136-rc1 and 5.15.181-rc1. Looks like it didn't apply cleanly to those versions.

The fixup patch was included in 6.14.5-rc1 and 6.12.26-rc1.