Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 4/8] mfd: zl3073x: Add support for devlink device info

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Thu Apr 17 2025 - 11:54:14 EST


On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 06:21:40PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Use devlink_alloc() to alloc zl3073x_dev structure, register the device
> as a devlink device and add devlink callback to provide devlink device
> info.

...

> /**
> * zl3073x_devm_alloc - allocates zl3073x device structure
> * @dev: pointer to device structure
> @@ -124,12 +204,18 @@ static const struct regmap_config zl3073x_regmap_config = {
> struct zl3073x_dev *zl3073x_devm_alloc(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct zl3073x_dev *zldev;
> + struct devlink *devlink;
> int rc;
>
> - zldev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*zldev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!zldev)
> + devlink = devlink_alloc(&zl3073x_devlink_ops, sizeof(*zldev), dev);
> + if (!devlink)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> + /* Add devres action to free devlink device */
> + if (devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zl3073x_devlink_free, devlink))
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

Please, do not shadow the error codes. You might miss something. Shadowing
error codes needs a good justification.

> + zldev = devlink_priv(devlink);
> zldev->dev = dev;

> }

...

> + /* Add devres action to unregister devlink device */
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(zldev->dev, zl3073x_devlink_unregister,
> + devlink);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;

The code is even inconsistent in one patch!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko