Re: [PATCH RFC 04/28] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants

[Johannes Weiner]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:45:08AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> It is inappropriate to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants in conjunction with
> unlock_page_lruvec() variants, as this involves the inconsistent operation of
> locking a folio while unlocking a page. To rectify this, the functions
> unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} are renamed to lruvec_unlock{_irq,
> _irqrestore}.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>