Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] platform/x86/amd: pmc: use FCH_PM_BASE definition
From: Yazen Ghannam
Date: Wed Apr 16 2025 - 09:53:13 EST
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 07:26:57PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The s2idle mmio quirk uses a scratch register in the FCH.
> > > Adjust the code to clarify that.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v4:
> > > * Use fch.h instead
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/amd/fch.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc-quirks.c | 3 ++-
> > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd/fch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd/fch.h
> > > index a5fd91ff92df3..9b32e8a03193e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd/fch.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd/fch.h
> > > @@ -8,5 +8,6 @@
> > > /* register offsets from PM base */
> > > #define FCH_PM_DECODEEN 0x00
> > > #define FCH_PM_DECODEEN_SMBUS0SEL GENMASK(20, 19)
> > > +#define FCH_PM_SCRATCH 0x80
> > >
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc-quirks.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc-quirks.c
> > > index b4f49720c87f6..3c680d2029f62 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc-quirks.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc/pmc-quirks.c
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > > * Author: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> > > */
> > >
> > > +#include <asm/amd/fch.h>
> >
> > Arch headers should go after linux headers, I think.
>
> That's true, but it's a mostly stylistic requirement these days.
>
> > So that arch stuff can override generic stuff.
>
> Arch headers that override generic stuff are very much supposed to be
> able to build stand-alone and in pretty much any order with other
> headers, with very few exceptions. Ordering dependencies are very much
> frowned upon, because if they don't trigger build failures they can
> result in subtle breakages.
>
Ah okay, thanks for clarifying!
-Yazen