Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Track node vacancy to reduce worst case allocation counts
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Apr 09 2025 - 20:30:01 EST
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:51:29 -0400 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4/7/25 2:40 PM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> > v3[3] -> v4:
> > - fix bug reported by Vasily Gorbik by fixing condition for
> > mast_overflow() and add test case for this condition. This fix
> > was also tested on s390 by Vasily.
> >
> > - cleanup new_height variable usage in mas_spanning_rebalance()
> > and add an additional test to make sure mt_height() is correct
> > after a rebalance causes a tree's height to decrease per Liam.
> >
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Could the following fixup patch be applied to the end of this series? If
> you'd prefer a new version of the series I can do that as well.
Liam mentioned a couple of "nits" so I think a V5 would be appropriate,
thanks.