Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: fix missing lock protection

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Tue Feb 25 2025 - 15:56:39 EST

Next message: Lokesh Gidra: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: do not block on locking a large folio with raised refcount"
Previous message: Kent Overstreet: "Re: C aggregate passing (Rust kernel policy)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2/20/25 7:07 PM, Chaohai Chen wrote:

async_scan_lock is designed to protect the scanning_hosts list,
but there is no protection here.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>

Next message: Lokesh Gidra: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: do not block on locking a large folio with raised refcount"
Previous message: Kent Overstreet: "Re: C aggregate passing (Rust kernel policy)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]