Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package")

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Mon May 13 2024 - 10:08:51 EST

Next message: Maxwell Bland: "[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64"
Previous message: Christophe ROULLIER: "Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: net: add phy-supply property for stm32"
In reply to: Lyude Paul: "Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package")"
Next in thread: Lyude Paul: "Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package")"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, May 08 2024 at 19:21, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Regarding the test results - I tried possible_cpus all the way up to 17
> and nothing got the machine to boot. However, possible_cpus=8
> intremap=off did get the machine to boot successfully

Oh. That's interesting.

Does v6.9 (released yesterday) boot with just 'intremap=off' too?

Thanks,

tglx

Next message: Maxwell Bland: "[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64"
Previous message: Christophe ROULLIER: "Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: net: add phy-supply property for stm32"
In reply to: Lyude Paul: "Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package")"
Next in thread: Lyude Paul: "Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package")"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]