Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] tools/perf: Fix a comment about multi_regs in extract_reg_offset function

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue May 07 2024 - 10:53:16 EST


On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:40:15PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:19 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Fix a comment in function which explains how multi_regs field gets set
> > for an instruction. In the example, "mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4)", the
> > comment mistakenly referred to "dst_multi_regs = 0". Correct it to use
> > "src_multi_regs = 0"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cherry picked this one into perf-tools-next.

Thanks,

- Arnaldo