Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Assume sysfs event names are always the same case

[Ian Rogers]

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 11:15 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024-05-02 12:01 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > By assuming sysfs events are either upper or lower case, the case
> > insensitive event parsing can probe for the existence of files rather
> > then loading all events in a directory. When the event is a json event
> > like inst_retired.any on Intel, this reduces the number of openat
> > calls on a Tigerlake laptop from 325 down to 255.
> >
> > v1 sent as an RFC:
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240413040812.4042051-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > v2: addresses review feedback from Kan Liang, by updating
> >     documentation and adding tests.
> >
> > v3: incorporate feedback from Thomas Richter <tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     that s390 event names are all upper case. Do a lower case probe
> >     then an upper case probe, make documentation and tests also agree.
> >
> > v4: add checks to write (kernel test robot) and fix a typo.
> >
> > Ian Rogers (6):
> >   perf test pmu-events: Make it clearer that pmu-events tests json
> >     events
> >   perf Document: Sysfs event names must be lower or upper case
> >   perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed test APIs
> >   perf test pmu: Add an eagerly loaded event test
> >   perf test pmu: Test all sysfs PMU event names are the same case
> >   perf pmu: Assume sysfs events are always the same case
> >
> >  .../sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events     |   6 +
> >  tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c                 |   2 +-
> >  tools/perf/tests/pmu.c                        | 468 ++++++++++++------
> >  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c                |   2 +-
> >  tools/perf/util/parse-events.h                |   2 +-
> >  tools/perf/util/pmu.c                         | 111 +++--
> >  tools/perf/util/pmu.h                         |   4 +-
> >  tools/perf/util/pmus.c                        |  16 +-
> >  tools/perf/util/pmus.h                        |   2 +
> >  9 files changed, 416 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Except the warning for the uninitialized 'ret', the rest looks good to me.

Thanks Kan, I'll hunt that down to fix in v5 and add your reviewed-by.
Would be awesome to get Thomas or someone else's s390 thumbs up. The
differences between v3 to v5 should be very minor, so I'd accept a
check on any of them :-)

Ian

> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Kan