Re: [PATCH] device property: introduce fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:58:26PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 5/2/24 17:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:

..

> >> This macro has been tested with a patch series that has not been
> >> applied yet and is under discussion in input [1], which makes use of the
> >> non-scoped version of the loop.
> > 
> > So, why should we apply a dead code?
> 
> I will add this patch to the series I mentioned, so there is a first use
> case.

Sounds like a good plan.

> Even if the _available variant is preferred, the other one is more
> widely used, and having a scoped version will allow for safer code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko