Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

[Maíra Canal]

Hi Tvrtko,

On 4/1/24 10:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 01/04/2024 13:45, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 01.04.24 um 14:39 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
> > > On 29/03/2024 00:00, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:53 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no point in compiling in the list and mutex operations 
> > > > > which are
> > > > > only used from the dma-buf debugfs code, if debugfs is not compiled 
> > > > > in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Put the code in questions behind some kconfig guards and so save 
> > > > > some text
> > > > > and maybe even a pointer per object at runtime when not enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > How would patches to dma-buf be typically landed? Via what tree I 
> > > mean? drm-misc-next?
> >
> > That should go through drm-misc-next.
> >
> > And feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian König 
> > <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> as well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Maarten if I got it right you are handling the next drm-misc-next pull - 
> could you merge this one please?

Applied to drm-misc/drm-misc-next!

Best Regards,
- Maíra

> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko