RE: [PATCH v6 1/2] clk: Provide managed helper to get and enable bulk clocks

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Shradha Todi (2024-03-15 04:34:44)
> > 
> > Quoting Shradha Todi (2024-03-06 04:13:03)
> > > >
> > > > When clk_bulk_get_all() returns zero then we return success here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, we are returning success in case there are no clocks as well. In
> > > case there are no clocks defined in the DT-node, then it is assumed
> > > that the driver does not need any clock manipulation for driver
> > > operation. So the intention here is to continue without throwing
> > > error.
> > 
> > Maybe we shouldn't even return the clks to the caller. Do you have any use for
> > the clk pointers?
> 
> The intention to return the clk pointers was in the case where caller wants to
> manipulate a particular clock in certain conditions. They can obtain the clock pointer
> and use clk_set_parent, clk_set_rate on those particular clocks.
> But I understand that in that case users can use existing clk_bulk_get_all() API.
> So, should I go ahead and send v7?
> 

No, I think this is fine.