On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:17:58 +0800
Jie Luo <quic_luoj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/10/2023 4:53 PM, Jie Luo wrote:
On 11/9/2023 5:16 PM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:32:36 +0800
Jie Luo <quic_luoj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
What I understand from this is that this PHY can be used either as a
switch, in which case port 4 would be connected to the host interface
at up to 2.5G, or as a quad-phy, but since it uses QUSGMII the link
speed would be limited to 1G per-port, is that correct ?
When the PHY works on the interface mode QUSGMII for quad-phy, all 4
PHYs can support to the max link speed 2.5G, actually the PHY can
support to max link speed 2.5G for all supported interface modes
including qusgmii and sgmii.
I'm a bit confused then, as the USGMII spec says that Quad USGMII really
is for quad 10/100/1000 speeds, using 10b/8b encoding.
Aren't you using the USXGMII mode instead, which can convey 4 x 2.5Gbps
with 66b/64b encoding ?
Thanks,
Maxime
Hi Maxime,
Yes, for quad PHY mode, it is using 66b/64 encoding.
it seems that PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII is for single port,
so i take the interface name PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QUSGMII for
quad PHYs here.
can we apply PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII to quad PHYs in this
case(qca8084 quad PHY mode)?
Thanks,
Jie.
one more thing, if we use the PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII for
the quad PHY here, the MAC serdes can't distinguish the actual
mode PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII and 10G-QXGMII(qca8084 quad phy mode),
the MAC serdes has the different configurations for usxgmii(10g single
port) and qxsgmii(quad PHY).
Yes you do need a way to know which mode to use, what I'm wondering is
that the usxgmii spec actually defines something like 9 different modes
( 1/2/4/8 ports, with a total bandwidth ranging from 2.5Gbps to 20 Gbps
), should we define a phy mode for all of these variants, or should we
have another way of getting the mode variant (like, saying I want to
use usxgmii, in 4 ports mode, with the serdes at 10.3125Gbps).
That being said, QUSGMII already exists to define a specific variant of
USGMII, so maybe adding 10G-QXGMII is fine...
Also, net-next is still currently closed.