Re: [PATCH RFC 03/20] rust_binder: add threading support

From: Alice Ryhl
Date: Wed Nov 08 2023 - 05:28:19 EST


Finn Behrens <finn@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 1 Nov 2023, at 19:01, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/android/error.rs b/drivers/android/error.rs
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..41fc4347ab55
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/android/error.rs
>> +
>> +impl core::fmt::Debug for BinderError {
>> + fn fmt(&self, f: &mut core::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> core::fmt::Result {
>> + match self.reply {
>> + BR_FAILED_REPLY => match self.source.as_ref() {
>> + Some(source) => f
>> + .debug_struct("BR_FAILED_REPLY")
>> + .field("source", source)
>> + .finish(),
>> + None => f.pad("BR_FAILED_REPLY"),
>> + },
>> + BR_DEAD_REPLY => f.pad("BR_DEAD_REPLY"),
>> + BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE => f.pad("BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE"),
>> + _ => f
>> + .debug_struct("BinderError")
>> + .field("reply", &self.reply)
>> + .finish(),
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Renaming the debug_struct itself feels like it will make it harder to
> find later, as I would expect that a debug implementation names the
> struct its from.
>
> Also this has the fallback in CamelCase and all defined cases as
> SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE. Maybe rather in the defined cases something like
> f.debug_struct(‘BinderError’).field(‘reply’, “name”)?

Yeah, you're right. I'll improve the debug formatting. Thanks for the
suggestion.

Alice