Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:06 AM Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I kindly ask your support to add the missing reviewed-by/acked-by. I
> summarize what is missing below:
>
> - @Mimi: patches 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 19, 21, 22, 23 (IMA/EVM-specific
>          patches)
> - @Al/@Christian: patches 10-17 (VFS-specific patches)
> - @Paul: patches 10-23 (VFS-specific patches/new LSM hooks/new LSMs)

This patchset is next in my review queue :)

> - @David Howells/@Jarkko: patch 18 (new LSM hook in the key subsystem)
> - @Chuck Lever: patch 12 (new LSM hook in nfsd/vfs.c)
>
> Paul, as I mentioned I currently based the patch set on lsm/dev-
> staging, which include the following dependencies:
>
> 8f79e425c140 lsm: don't yet account for IMA in LSM_CONFIG_COUNT calculation
> 3c91a124f23d lsm: drop LSM_ID_IMA
>
> I know you wanted to wait until at least rc1 to make lsm/dev. I will
> help for rebasing my patch set, if needed.

No, it should be fine for right now.  Thanks for your patience and
help with all of this.

-- 
paul-moore.com