Re: [PATCH 0/2] OP-TEE FF-A notifications

[Sumit Garg]

On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:09, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 9:53 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 13:32, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 3:05 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 18:46, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:46:55PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:29, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Sumit,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:32:47AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Jens,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 13:34, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This patchset adds support for using FF-A notifications as a delivery
> > > > > > > > > mechanism of asynchronous notifications from OP-TEE running in the secure
> > > > > > > > > world. Support for asynchronous notifications via the SMC ABI was added in
> > > > > > > > > [1], here we add the counterpart needed when using the the FF-A ABI.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Support for FF-A notifications is added with [2] and this patch set is based
> > > > > > > > > on Sudeeps tree at [3].
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's good to see FF-A notifications support coming through. The good
> > > > > > > > aspect here is that FF-A uses a common secure world SGI for
> > > > > > > > notifications and doesn't have to deal with platform specific reserved
> > > > > > > > SPI for notifications.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From OP-TEE point of view I think most of the secure SGI donation base
> > > > > > > > would be common, so can we switch the SMC ABI to use this donated
> > > > > > > > secure world SGI for notifications too?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The SMC ABI driver picks up the interrupt used for notification from
> > > > > > > device-tree, so there's a chance that it just works if a donated SGI is
> > > > > > > supplied instead. We'll need some changes in the secure world side of
> > > > > > > OP-TEE, but they wouldn't affect the ABI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AFAIK, a secure world donated SGIs doesn't support IRQ mapping via DT.
> > > > > > The FF-A driver explicitly creates that mapping here [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > That looks a lot like what platform_get_irq() does via of_irq_get().
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > There is GIC_SPI or GIC_PPI but nothing like GIC_SGI in DT bindings [1].
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h
> > > >
> > > > > > Moreover
> > > > > > it's better to detect it via an SMC call rather than hard coded via DT
> > > > > > as FF-A driver does.
> > > > >
> > > > > Typo? I guess you mean that you prefer that way the FF-A driver does it
> > > > > rather than having it set in the DT.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah sorry about that. We shouldn't use DT if OP-TEE features are discoverable.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Assuming that you only care about "arm,gic-v3". The SGI will likely
> > > > > always be the same so it shouldn't be too hard to keep the correct
> > > > > configuration in DT.
> > > >
> > > > See above, DT looks like it does not support SGI.
> > >
> > > You're right.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So the ABI should dynamically detect if there is a donated SGI then
> > > > > > use it otherwise fallback to SPI/PPI detection via DT. This would make
> > > > > > the notifications feature platform agnostic and we can drop legacy DT
> > > > > > methods from optee-os entirely but still need to maintain them in the
> > > > > > kernel for backwards compatibility.
> > > > >
> > > > > We care about compatibility in both directions so we'd need to keep it
> > > > > in OP-TEE too, but perhaps under a config flag.
> > > >
> > > > Isn't it just supported on Qemu right now in OP-TEE? I hope dropping a
> > > > feature won't be a problem there compared with the maintenance burden.
> > >
> > > I'd rather not remove this since I believe it can support more
> > > configurations (different interrupt controllers), but feel free to
> > > propose a patch with the new ABI.
> >
> > Having a second thought here, I think adding further ABIs (redundant
> > ABIs become maintenance burden overtime) don't make sense until we see
> > real users of notifications. Have you been able to discover real users
> > of this asynchronous notifications feature in OP-TEE?
>
> No, not upstream. There have been questions about a feature like this
> from time to time in the past and I guess non-trivial interrupt
> handling will soon need it.

Okay let's keep the way it is today unless we really need support for SGIs too.

-Sumit

>
> Cheers,
> Jens
>
> >
> > -Sumit
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jens
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -Sumit
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jens
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git/tree/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c?h=ffa-updates-6.7#n1283
> > > > > > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git/tree/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c?h=ffa-updates-6.7#n1275
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Sumit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Jens
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Sumit
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211103090255.998070-1-jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > > > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231005-ffa_v1-1_notif-v4-0-cddd3237809c@xxxxxxx/
> > > > > > > > > [3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git/tag/?h=ffa-updates-6.7
> > > > > > > > >     commit bcefd1bf63b1 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Upgrade the driver version to v1.1")
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Jens
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jens Wiklander (2):
> > > > > > > > >   optee: provide optee_do_bottom_half() as a common function
> > > > > > > > >   optee: ffa_abi: add asynchronous notifications
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/tee/optee/call.c          | 31 ++++++++++-
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c       | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h     | 28 ++++++++--
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h |  9 ++-
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c       | 36 ++----------
> > > > > > > > >  5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > base-commit: bcefd1bf63b1ec9bb08067021cf47f0fad96f395
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > > > > > >