Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation of software IO TLB bounce buffers

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jul 31 2023 - 12:05:09 EST

Next message: Jorge Lopez: "Re: [PATCH 2/5] hp-bioscfg: Fix memory leaks in ordered_list_elements_from_package"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] asm-generic: Unify uapi bitsperlong.h for arm64, riscv and loongarch"
In reply to: Petr Tesarik: "[PATCH v6 9/9] swiotlb: search the software IO TLB only if the device makes use of it"
Next in thread: Petr Tesařík: "Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation of software IO TLB bounce buffers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I was just going to apply this, but patch 1 seems to have a non-trivial
conflict with the is_swiotlb_active removal in pci-dma.c. Can you resend
against the current dma-mapping for-next tree?

Next message: Jorge Lopez: "Re: [PATCH 2/5] hp-bioscfg: Fix memory leaks in ordered_list_elements_from_package"
Previous message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] asm-generic: Unify uapi bitsperlong.h for arm64, riscv and loongarch"
In reply to: Petr Tesarik: "[PATCH v6 9/9] swiotlb: search the software IO TLB only if the device makes use of it"
Next in thread: Petr Tesařík: "Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation of software IO TLB bounce buffers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]