Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] rcu/tree: Remove superfluous return from void call_rcu* functions

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 02:27:36PM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> The return keyword is not needed here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Odd that this is allowed.  ;-)

I took 1, 2, and 5, thank you!  It would still be good to get Frederic's
eyes on 3 and 4.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index cb1caefa8bd0..7c79480bfaa0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
>   */
>  void call_rcu_hurry(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
>  {
> -	return __call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
> +	__call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
>  #endif
> @@ -2764,7 +2764,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
>   */
>  void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
>  {
> -	return __call_rcu_common(head, func, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY));
> +	__call_rcu_common(head, func, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY));
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
>  
> -- 
> 2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog
>