On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:40:10PM +0800, Tim Jiang wrote:[Tim] Hi Johan: I think we no need to sort it, we only add the new btsoc name following the older one, for example , ar300x is the oldest , ROME is new than ar300x, actually qca2066 is newer version chip than qca6390, so I does not think we need to sort it.
This patch make the print btsoc type expression more clearly.I still think the above should be sorted (alphabetically) as maintaining
Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <quic_tjiang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
index 9b785c947d96..e11d47210e80 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
@@ -1748,6 +1748,7 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
const char *firmware_name = qca_get_firmware_name(hu);
int ret;
struct qca_btsoc_version ver;
+ const char *soc_name;
ret = qca_check_speeds(hu);
if (ret)
@@ -1762,10 +1763,32 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
*/
set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_SIMULTANEOUS_DISCOVERY, &hdev->quirks);
- bt_dev_info(hdev, "setting up %s",
- qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type) ? "wcn399x" :
- (soc_type == QCA_WCN6750) ? "wcn6750" :
- (soc_type == QCA_WCN6855) ? "wcn6855" : "ROME/QCA6390");
+ switch (soc_type) {
+ case QCA_AR3002:
+ soc_name = "ar300x";
+ break;
+ case QCA_ROME:
+ soc_name = "ROME";
+ break;
+ case QCA_QCA6390:
+ soc_name = "QCA6390";
+ break;
+ case QCA_WCN3990:
+ case QCA_WCN3991:
+ case QCA_WCN3998:
+ soc_name = "wcn399x";
+ break;
+ case QCA_WCN6750:
+ soc_name = "wcn6750";
+ break;
+ case QCA_WCN6855:
+ soc_name = "wcn6855";
+ break;
these lists otherwise soon becomes harder than it should be. And similar
throughout the driver.
+ default:Johan
+ soc_name = "unknown soc";
+ break;
+ }
+ bt_dev_info(hdev, "setting up %s", soc_name);