Re: [PATCH v15 08/13] remoteproc: mediatek: Remove dependency of MT8195 SCP L2TCM power control on dual-core SCP

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:41:27AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> Previously, SCP core 0 controlled the power of L2TCM and dictated that
> SCP core 1 could only boot after SCP core 0. To address this constraint,
> extracted the power control flow of L2TCM and made it shared
> between both cores, enabling support of arbitrary boot order.
>

s/of/for

> The flow for controlling L2TCM power has been incorporated into the
> mt8195_scp_before_load() and mt8195_scp_stop() APIs, which are
> respectively invoked during the rproc->ops->start() and
> rproc->ops->stop() operations. These APIs effectively serve the same
> purpose as the rproc prepare()/unprepare() APIs."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index 1438159ae736..fea05bbba9aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
>  	size_t l1tcm_size;
>  	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
>  	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> +	/* Prevent concurrent operations of this structure and L2TCM power control. */
> +	struct mutex cluster_lock;
> +	u32 l2tcm_refcnt;
>  };
>  
>  struct mtk_scp {
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index 34095a461e15..c624f9c3db17 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -454,19 +454,37 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +static int mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> -	writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +
> +	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
> +		/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> +		writel(0xff, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +
> +		/* Power on L2TCM */
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +				  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	}
> +
> +	scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt += 1;
>  
> +	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
>  	writel(1, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  
> -	/* enable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> -			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
> +
>  	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> @@ -479,6 +497,8 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
>  
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_on(scp);
> +
>  	scp_sram_power_on(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> @@ -645,14 +665,31 @@ static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	writel(0, scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
>  }
>  
> +static void mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = scp->cluster;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +
> +	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt > 0)
> +		scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt -= 1;
> +
> +	if (scp_cluster->l2tcm_refcnt == 0) {
> +		/* Power off L2TCM */
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +		scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +				   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	/* Disable SRAM clock */
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> -	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> -			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
> +
>  	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> @@ -661,6 +698,8 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  
>  static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> +	mt8195_scp_l2tcm_off(scp);
> +
>  	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
>  	scp_sram_power_off(scp->cluster->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
> @@ -1103,6 +1142,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> +	mutex_init(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
>  
>  	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -1126,6 +1166,7 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
>  		scp_free(scp);
>  	}
> +	mutex_destroy(&scp_cluster->cluster_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
> -- 
> 2.18.0
>