Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: ice_vsi_release cleanup

From: Maciej Fijalkowski
Date: Mon Jun 19 2023 - 08:38:53 EST


On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Petr Oros wrote:
> Since commit 6624e780a577fc ("ice: split ice_vsi_setup into smaller
> functions") ice_vsi_release does things twice. There is unregister
> netdev which is unregistered in ice_deinit_eth also.
>
> It also unregisters the devlink_port twice which is also unregistered
> in ice_deinit_eth(). This double deregistration is hidden because
> devl_port_unregister ignores the return value of xa_erase.
>
> [ 68.642167] Call Trace:
> [ 68.650385] ice_devlink_destroy_pf_port+0xe/0x20 [ice]
> [ 68.655656] ice_vsi_release+0x445/0x690 [ice]
> [ 68.660147] ice_deinit+0x99/0x280 [ice]
> [ 68.664117] ice_remove+0x1b6/0x5c0 [ice]
>
> [ 171.103841] Call Trace:
> [ 171.109607] ice_devlink_destroy_pf_port+0xf/0x20 [ice]
> [ 171.114841] ice_remove+0x158/0x270 [ice]
> [ 171.118854] pci_device_remove+0x3b/0xc0
> [ 171.122779] device_release_driver_internal+0xc7/0x170
> [ 171.127912] driver_detach+0x54/0x8c
> [ 171.131491] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd1
> [ 171.135406] pci_unregister_driver+0x2d/0xb0
> [ 171.139670] ice_module_exit+0xc/0x55f [ice]

Hi Petr,
can you tell us when in particular this call trace was observed?

CC: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> Fixes: 6624e780a577 ("ice: split ice_vsi_setup into smaller functions")
> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 27 ------------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> index 11ae0e41f518a1..284a1f0bfdb545 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> @@ -3272,39 +3272,12 @@ int ice_vsi_release(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
> return -ENODEV;
> pf = vsi->back;
>
> - /* do not unregister while driver is in the reset recovery pending
> - * state. Since reset/rebuild happens through PF service task workqueue,
> - * it's not a good idea to unregister netdev that is associated to the
> - * PF that is running the work queue items currently. This is done to
> - * avoid check_flush_dependency() warning on this wq
> - */
> - if (vsi->netdev && !ice_is_reset_in_progress(pf->state) &&
> - (test_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi->state))) {
> - unregister_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> - clear_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi->state);
> - }
> -
> - if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_PF)
> - ice_devlink_destroy_pf_port(pf);
> -
> if (test_bit(ICE_FLAG_RSS_ENA, pf->flags))
> ice_rss_clean(vsi);
>
> ice_vsi_close(vsi);
> ice_vsi_decfg(vsi);
>
> - if (vsi->netdev) {
> - if (test_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi->state)) {
> - unregister_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> - clear_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_REGISTERED, vsi->state);
> - }
> - if (test_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_ALLOCD, vsi->state)) {
> - free_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> - vsi->netdev = NULL;
> - clear_bit(ICE_VSI_NETDEV_ALLOCD, vsi->state);
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* retain SW VSI data structure since it is needed to unregister and
> * free VSI netdev when PF is not in reset recovery pending state,\
> * for ex: during rmmod.
> --
> 2.41.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan