Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: timer: atmel,at91sam9260-pit: convert to yaml

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/06/2023 14:09, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>
>>>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here?
>>>
>>> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it
>>> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept
>>> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this
>>> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you
>>> still prefer to add it back?
>>
>> I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not
>> in the other.
>>
> 
> As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this.
> 

ok

Best regards,
Krzysztof