Re: [RESEND v2 1/6] dt-bindings: power: Add JH7110 AON PMU support
From: Changhuang Liang
Date: Sat May 06 2023 - 08:26:27 EST
On 2023/5/6 18:17, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 09:45:07AM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/5/5 20:38, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 09:29:15AM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>
>>>> But if keep this "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon" compatible. Which .yaml match to
>>>> it? Use this series dt-bindings or syscon series dt-bindings.
>>>
>>> There is no syscon series anymore, it's part of the PLL series now:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20230414024157.53203-1-xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>> I don't really care what you, Walker & Xingyu decide to do, but add the
>>> binding in one series in a complete form. It's far less confusing to
>>> have only have one version of the binding on the go at once.
>>>
>>
>> Due to the current aon pmu needs to be adjusted, it affects the syscon in PLL series.
>> So It's inevitable to change syscon in PLL series.
>>
>> My current idea is PLL series don't add the aon_syscon node. I will add it in my
>> aon pmu series in next version
>
> That's fine. Rob was happy with the clock related parts, which was the
> original source of confusion there.
>
>> like this:
>>
>> aon_syscon: syscon@17010000 {
>> compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-pmu", "syscon";
>
> The syscon does a bunch of things of which one is a pmu. I don't see a
> reason to name this other than "starfive,jh100-aon-syscon".
>
OK, will replace "starfive,jh7110-aon-pmu" with "starfive,jh100-aon-syscon" in this series.
Thanks,
Changhuang