Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add support for multipd model
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Wed May 03 2023 - 12:27:44 EST
On 03/05/2023 12:59, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/7/2023 6:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:11:27 +0530, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>> Add new binding document for multipd model remoteproc.
>>> IPQ5018, IPQ9574 follows multipd model.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.yaml | 282 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 282 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.yaml
>>>
>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.example.dts:22:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5018.h: No such file or directory
>> 22 | #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5018.h>
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:419: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.example.dtb] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make: *** [Makefile:1512: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>
>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/1678164097-13247-2-git-send-email-quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>> should be noted in *this* patch.
>>
>> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
>> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
>> date:
>>
>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>
>> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
>> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
>> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>>
>
> I mentioned dependency link
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220621161126.15883-1-quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx/)
> in cover page patch because it's required for entire series. I will add
> dependency link's and raise new patchset.
Is the dependency merged for v6.4-rc1? Looks not, so this means the
patch cannot be merged for next three months.
Why do you need any dependency here in this binding?
Best regards,
Krzysztof