Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP313a PMIC

From: Andre Przywara
Date: Thu Mar 23 2023 - 10:00:02 EST


On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 01:40:34 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Chen-Yu,

thanks for the review!

> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 2:45 AM Martin Botka
> <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The AXP313a is a PMIC chip produced by X-Powers, it can be connected via
> > an I2C bus.
> > The name AXP1530 seems to appear as well, and this is what is used in
> > the BSP driver. From all we know it's the same chip, just a different
> > name. However we have only seen AXP313a chips in the wild, so go with
> > this name.
> >
> > Compared to the other AXP PMICs it's a rather simple affair: just three
> > DCDC converters, three LDOs, and no battery charging support.
> >
> > Describe the regmap and the MFD bits, along with the registers exposed
> > via I2C. Eventually advertise the device using the new compatible
> > string.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> > index f49fbd307958..f061177cb18e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id axp20x_i2c_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "x-powers,axp209", .data = (void *)AXP209_ID },
> > { .compatible = "x-powers,axp221", .data = (void *)AXP221_ID },
> > { .compatible = "x-powers,axp223", .data = (void *)AXP223_ID },
> > + { .compatible = "x-powers,axp313a", .data = (void *)AXP313A_ID},
> > { .compatible = "x-powers,axp803", .data = (void *)AXP803_ID },
> > { .compatible = "x-powers,axp806", .data = (void *)AXP806_ID },
> > { },
> > @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id axp20x_i2c_id[] = {
> > { "axp209", 0 },
> > { "axp221", 0 },
> > { "axp223", 0 },
> > + { "axp313a", 0 },
> > { "axp803", 0 },
> > { "axp806", 0 },
> > { },
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> > index 01a6bbb6d266..ff15775f3c27 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static const char * const axp20x_model_names[] = {
> > "AXP221",
> > "AXP223",
> > "AXP288",
> > + "AXP313a",
> > "AXP803",
> > "AXP806",
> > "AXP809",
> > @@ -154,6 +155,24 @@ static const struct regmap_range axp806_writeable_ranges[] = {
> > regmap_reg_range(AXP806_REG_ADDR_EXT, AXP806_REG_ADDR_EXT),
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct regmap_range axp313a_writeable_ranges[] = {
> > + regmap_reg_range(AXP313A_ON_INDICATE, AXP313A_IRQ_STATE),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct regmap_range axp313a_volatile_ranges[] = {
> > + regmap_reg_range(AXP313A_ON_INDICATE, AXP313A_IRQ_STATE),
>
> Why set the whole range as volatile? Why bother with a cache then?

Fixed.

>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct regmap_access_table axp313a_writeable_table = {
> > + .yes_ranges = axp313a_writeable_ranges,
> > + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(axp313a_writeable_ranges),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct regmap_access_table axp313a_volatile_table = {
> > + .yes_ranges = axp313a_volatile_ranges,
> > + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(axp313a_volatile_ranges),
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct regmap_range axp806_volatile_ranges[] = {
> > regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_IRQ1_STATE, AXP20X_IRQ2_STATE),
> > };
> > @@ -272,6 +291,15 @@ static const struct regmap_config axp288_regmap_config = {
> > .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct regmap_config axp313a_regmap_config = {
> > + .reg_bits = 8,
> > + .val_bits = 8,
> > + .wr_table = &axp313a_writeable_table,
> > + .volatile_table = &axp313a_volatile_table,
> > + .max_register = AXP313A_IRQ_STATE,
> > + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct regmap_config axp806_regmap_config = {
> > .reg_bits = 8,
> > .val_bits = 8,
> > @@ -415,6 +443,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq axp288_regmap_irqs[] = {
> > INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP288, BC_USB_CHNG, 5, 1),
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct regmap_irq axp313a_regmap_irqs[] = {
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, PEK_RIS_EDGE, 0, 7),
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, PEK_FAL_EDGE, 0, 6),
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, PEK_SHORT, 0, 5),
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, PEK_LONG, 0, 4),
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, DCDC3_V_LOW, 0, 3),
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, DCDC2_V_LOW, 0, 2),
> > + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP313A, DIE_TEMP_HIGH, 0, 0),
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct regmap_irq axp803_regmap_irqs[] = {
> > INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP803, ACIN_OVER_V, 0, 7),
> > INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP803, ACIN_PLUGIN, 0, 6),
> > @@ -548,6 +586,17 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp288_regmap_irq_chip = {
> >
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp313a_regmap_irq_chip = {
> > + .name = "axp313a_irq_chip",
> > + .status_base = AXP313A_IRQ_STATE,
> > + .ack_base = AXP313A_IRQ_STATE,
> > + .unmask_base = AXP313A_IRQ_EN,
> > + .init_ack_masked = true,
> > + .irqs = axp313a_regmap_irqs,
> > + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(axp313a_regmap_irqs),
> > + .num_regs = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp803_regmap_irq_chip = {
> > .name = "axp803",
> > .status_base = AXP20X_IRQ1_STATE,
> > @@ -676,6 +725,12 @@ static const struct mfd_cell axp152_cells[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > +static struct mfd_cell axp313a_cells[] = {
> > + {
> > + .name = "axp20x-regulator",
>
> Lee asked for MFD_CELL_NAME() in v7 here.

Fixed.

> Could you also add the power button cell? This would make it an actual
> MFD, and also complete, since that is the only other function this
> PMIC has. Or at least add a note mentioning it. Implementing it will

Done.

> require a device that actually routes that pin out. AFAICT the MangoPi
> doesn't.
>
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct resource axp288_adc_resources[] = {
> > DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP288_IRQ_GPADC, "GPADC"),
> > };
> > @@ -892,6 +947,12 @@ int axp20x_match_device(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
> > axp20x->regmap_irq_chip = &axp288_regmap_irq_chip;
> > axp20x->irq_flags = IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW;
> > break;
> > + case AXP313A_ID:
> > + axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp313a_cells);
> > + axp20x->cells = axp313a_cells;
> > + axp20x->regmap_cfg = &axp313a_regmap_config;
> > + axp20x->regmap_irq_chip = &axp313a_regmap_irq_chip;
> > + break;
> > case AXP803_ID:
> > axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp803_cells);
> > axp20x->cells = axp803_cells;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> > index 2058194807bd..12e4fc3e8391 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ enum axp20x_variants {
> > AXP221_ID,
> > AXP223_ID,
> > AXP288_ID,
> > + AXP313A_ID,
> > AXP803_ID,
> > AXP806_ID,
> > AXP809_ID,
> > @@ -91,6 +92,17 @@ enum axp20x_variants {
> > #define AXP22X_ALDO3_V_OUT 0x2a
> > #define AXP22X_CHRG_CTRL3 0x35
> >
> > +#define AXP313A_ON_INDICATE 0x00
> > +#define AXP313A_OUTPUT_CONTROL 0x10
> > +#define AXP313A_DCDC1_CONRTOL 0x13
> > +#define AXP313A_DCDC2_CONRTOL 0x14
> > +#define AXP313A_DCDC3_CONRTOL 0x15
> > +#define AXP313A_ALDO1_CONRTOL 0x16
> > +#define AXP313A_DLDO1_CONRTOL 0x17
>
> Please also add register 0x1a (note, some bits of this are volatile)
> and implement power off with bit 7. The current axp_power_off()
> function will not work for this PMIC.

Ah, good catch, thanks. Though I guess this will be unused (on 64-bit
SoCs), since PSCI poweroff takes precedence due to its higher firmware
priority.
Fixed anyway, need to test this with a hacked priority value.

Though the volatility of this register is a bit questionable, isn't it? It
just seems to apply to the poweroff and reset bits, that are self-reset.
Nobody cares for the former, and we don't use the reset (yet). I added it
to the volatile range anyway.

> This PMIC also supports software-triggered reset with bit 6 in the same
> register. This function would be nice to have, however there's no related
> code in the mfd driver right now, since IIRC none of the other ones had
> this.

What would be the use case? Who would trigger that reset? I guess it might
be more useful for management firmware like crust?

> > +#define AXP313A_OUTPUT_MONITOR 0x1d
>
> Not sure why you need this?

Removed.

> > +#define AXP313A_IRQ_EN 0x20
> > +#define AXP313A_IRQ_STATE 0x21
> > +
> > #define AXP806_STARTUP_SRC 0x00
> > #define AXP806_CHIP_ID 0x03
> > #define AXP806_PWR_OUT_CTRL1 0x10
> > @@ -322,6 +334,16 @@ enum {
> > AXP22X_REG_ID_MAX,
> > };
> >
> > +enum {
> > + AXP313A_DCDC1 = 0,
> > + AXP313A_DCDC2,
> > + AXP313A_DCDC3,
> > + AXP313A_LDO1,
>
> This is called ALDO1 in the datasheet ...
>
> > + AXP313A_LDO2,
>
> ... and this one DLDO1.
>
> You already have the registers named that way, so you might as well
> fix the names here as well.

Fixed.

Thanks,
Andre

>
>
> Thanks
> ChenYu
>
> > + AXP313A_RTC_LDO,
> > + AXP313A_REG_ID_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> > enum {
> > AXP806_DCDCA = 0,
> > AXP806_DCDCB,
> > @@ -548,6 +570,16 @@ enum axp288_irqs {
> > AXP288_IRQ_BC_USB_CHNG,
> > };
> >
> > +enum axp313a_irqs {
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_DIE_TEMP_HIGH,
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_DCDC2_V_LOW = 2,
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_DCDC3_V_LOW,
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> > + AXP313A_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> > +};
> > +
> > enum axp803_irqs {
> > AXP803_IRQ_ACIN_OVER_V = 1,
> > AXP803_IRQ_ACIN_PLUGIN,
> > --
> > 2.39.0
> >