Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the mm tree

[Jens Axboe]

On 3/22/23 5:13 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>  +	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_pipe(i))) {
>>  +		copied = copy_page_to_iter_pipe(page, offset, bytes, i);
>>  +		goto out;
>>  +	}
> 
> This bit would need to be removed from copy_page_to_iter_atomic() as the two
> functions it calls should be removed by the patch in the block tree.

Maybe it'd be better to consolidate rather than split the changes over
two trees?

-- 
Jens Axboe