Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/03/2023 07:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/03/2023 13:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 14/03/2023 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> ================
>>> 1. Rebase
>>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
>>>     actually might take some clocks.
>>
>> Although the approach looks correct, I think that in some cases it tries 
>> to mark devices compatible judging from the current driver, not from the 
>> hardware itself.
> 
> Which is what compatibility is about...
> 
>>
>> For the reference, on msm8994 the apcs is a clock controller for the l2 
>> clocks (which we do not support yet). If I'm not mistaken, on msm8976 
>> the apcs region contains a mux for the cluster1 clocks. On sdm630/660 
>> the apcs region also seems to be involved in CPU clocks scaling.
> 
> The question is this means they are incompatible?

Since there are no more comments I assume they are actually compatible
in the terms of SW interface.

Best regards,
Krzysztof