Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] coresight: Enable and disable helper devices adjacent to the path

[Mike Leach]

On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 11:04, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2023 16:06, James Clark wrote:
> > Currently CATU is the only helper device, and its enable and disable
> > calls are hard coded. To allow more helper devices to be added in a
> > generic way, remove these hard coded calls and just enable and disable
> > all helper devices.
> >
> > This has to apply to helpers adjacent to the path, because they will
> > never be in the path. CATU was already discovered in this way, so
> > there is no change there.
> >
> > One change that is needed is for CATU to call back into ETR to allocate
> > the buffer. Because the enable call was previously hard coded, it was
> > done at a point where the buffer was already allocated, but this is no
> > longer the case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c  | 34 ++++++++--
> >   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c  | 68 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >   .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c   | 28 --------
> >   include/linux/coresight.h                     |  3 +-
> >   4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c
> > index bc90a03f478f..24a08a2b96b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c
> > @@ -395,13 +395,32 @@ static inline int catu_wait_for_ready(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata)
> >       return coresight_timeout(csa, CATU_STATUS, CATU_STATUS_READY, 1);
> >   }
> >
> > -static int catu_enable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata, void *data)
> > +static struct coresight_device *
> > +catu_get_etr_device(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +     struct coresight_device *tmp;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < csdev->pdata->nr_inconns; i++) {
> > +             tmp = csdev->pdata->in_conns[i].remote_dev;
> > +             if (tmp && tmp->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK &&
> > +                 tmp->subtype.sink_subtype ==
> > +                         CORESIGHT_DEV_SUBTYPE_SINK_SYSMEM)
> > +                     return tmp;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int catu_enable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata, enum cs_mode cs_mode,
> > +                       void *data)
> >   {
> >       int rc;
> >       u32 control, mode;
> > -     struct etr_buf *etr_buf = data;
> > +     struct etr_buf *etr_buf = NULL;
> >       struct device *dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev;
> >       struct coresight_device *csdev = drvdata->csdev;
> > +     struct coresight_device *etrdev;
> >
> >       if (catu_wait_for_ready(drvdata))
> >               dev_warn(dev, "Timeout while waiting for READY\n");
> > @@ -416,6 +435,12 @@ static int catu_enable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata, void *data)
> >       if (rc)
> >               return rc;
> >
> > +     etrdev = catu_get_etr_device(csdev);
> > +     if (etrdev) {
> > +             etr_buf = tmc_etr_get_buffer(etrdev, cs_mode, data);
> > +             if (IS_ERR(etr_buf))
> > +                     return PTR_ERR(etr_buf);
> > +     }
>
> WARN_ON(!etrdev) ? We are not supposed to reach in the first place and
> return.
>
>
> >       control |= BIT(CATU_CONTROL_ENABLE);
> >
> >       if (etr_buf && etr_buf->mode == ETR_MODE_CATU) {
> > @@ -441,13 +466,14 @@ static int catu_enable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata, void *data)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > -static int catu_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *data)
> > +static int catu_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev, enum cs_mode mode,
> > +                    void *data)
> >   {
> >       int rc;
> >       struct catu_drvdata *catu_drvdata = csdev_to_catu_drvdata(csdev);
> >
> >       CS_UNLOCK(catu_drvdata->base);
> > -     rc = catu_enable_hw(catu_drvdata, data);
> > +     rc = catu_enable_hw(catu_drvdata, mode, data);
> >       CS_LOCK(catu_drvdata->base);
> >       return rc;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> > index a8ba7493c09a..3e6ccd9e8d4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> > @@ -441,6 +441,34 @@ static int coresight_enable_source(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +static int coresight_enable_helper(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> > +                                enum cs_mode mode, void *sink_data)
>
> minor nit: s/sink_data/data/ ? Though it is always either sink_data
> (perf mode) or NULL (sysfs mode), for the core code it is simply an
> opaque data.
>
> Rest looks fine to me.
>
> Suzuki
>
>
Reviewed by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx>


--
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Manchester Design Centre. UK