Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] kunit: drm/tests: move generic helpers

[Vaittinen, Matti]

On 3/21/23 20:59, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-20 22:45:52)
>> Morning Stephen,
>>
>> On 3/20/23 21:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-18 23:36:20)
>> Besides, I was not sure if you were planning to add similar helper or
>> just wrappers to individual functions. Wanted to ping you just in case
>> this has some impact to what you do.
> 
> I don't have a need to bind a device to a driver to satisfy devm APIs
> currently. I could probably use it though to test some devm code in the
> clk APIs. The only impact is that we're modifying the same files.

Thanks for clarifying this.

>>> Have you Cced kunit folks and the
>>> list on the kunit patches? They may have some opinion.
>>
>> This patch was should have contained the
>> include/kunit/platform_device.h. That file was pulling the Kunit people
>> in recipients but I messed up things with last minute changes so both
>> the header and people were dropped. I'll fix this for v5.
>>
> 
> Ok, I'll be on the lookout for v5. From what I can tell kunit goes
> through the kernel selftest tree and there isn't a kunit git tree as
> such.

Right. I am not sure what will be the best tree to carry the testability 
changes. It seems that all of the IIO-tests in v5 will depend on the 
kunit stuff, and I think I will also include the DRM test fixes in this 
series as well just to keep things sorted in my mailbox. Anyways, I hope 
to finish the changes for v5 soon(ish) - maybe already Today and in any 
case during this week. I'll be CC:ing you and Brendan with (relevant 
patches of) v5 as well.

Yours,
	-- Matti

-- 
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~