Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] clk: hisilicon: Add complex clock for Hi3798

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Mar 21 2023 - 13:31:22 EST


Quoting David Yang (2023-03-20 13:40:36)
> @@ -59,6 +61,131 @@ static const struct hisi_fixed_rate_clock hi3798_fixed_rate_clks[] = {
> { HI3798_FIXED_250M, "250m", NULL, 0, 250000000, },
> };
>
> +struct hi3798_complex_clock {
> + unsigned int id;
> + const char *name;
> + const char *parent_name;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long offset;
> + u32 mask;
> + u32 value;
> + const char *alias;
> +};
> +
> +struct hi3798_clk_complex {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + u32 mask;
> + u32 value;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_complex_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct hi3798_clk_complex, hw)

Missing header include for container_of()

> +
> +static int hi3798_clk_complex_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct hi3798_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
> + val &= ~(clk->mask);
> + val |= clk->value;
> + writel_relaxed(val, clk->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void hi3798_clk_complex_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct hi3798_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
> + val &= ~(clk->mask);
> + writel_relaxed(val, clk->reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int hi3798_clk_complex_is_prepared(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct hi3798_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
> + return (val & clk->mask) == clk->value;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops hi3798_clk_complex_ops = {
> + .prepare = hi3798_clk_complex_prepare,
> + .unprepare = hi3798_clk_complex_unprepare,
> + .is_prepared = hi3798_clk_complex_is_prepared,
> +};
> +
> +static int hi3798_clk_register_complex(const struct hi3798_complex_clock *clks, int nums,
> + struct hisi_clock_data *data)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = data->base;
> + int i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nums; i++) {
> + struct hi3798_clk_complex *p_clk;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk_init_data init;
> +
> + p_clk = kzalloc(sizeof(*p_clk), GFP_KERNEL);

Use devm?

> + if (!p_clk) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_kzalloc;
> + }
> +
> + init.name = clks[i].name;
> + init.ops = &hi3798_clk_complex_ops;
> +
> + init.flags = 0;
> + init.parent_names =
> + (clks[i].parent_name ? &clks[i].parent_name : NULL);
> + init.num_parents = (clks[i].parent_name ? 1 : 0);
> +
> + p_clk->reg = base + clks[i].offset;
> + p_clk->mask = clks[i].mask;
> + p_clk->value = clks[i].value;
> + p_clk->hw.init = &init;
> +
> + clk = clk_register(NULL, &p_clk->hw);

Use devm? Also, please use devm_clk_hw_register()

> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + kfree(p_clk);
> +err_kzalloc:
> + pr_err("%s: failed to register clock %s\n",
> + __func__, clks[i].name);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (clks[i].alias)
> + clk_register_clkdev(clk, clks[i].alias, NULL);

Do you use this clkdev lookup? You have an OF clk provider. Hopefully
this can be removed.

> +
> + data->clk_data.clks[clks[i].id] = clk;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + while (i--)
> + clk_unregister(data->clk_data.clks[clks[i].id]);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +