Re: [PATCH 0/3] edits in greybus driver

[Menna Mahmoud]

On ٢١‏/٣‏/٢٠٢٣ ١٣:٤٦, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>
> > This patchset includes change happened in greybus driver in three
> > different files two of them patch one and three related to
> > checkpatch issue and in second patch convert two
> > `container_of` macros into inline functions.
> >
> > Menna Mahmoud (3):
> >    staging: greybus: remove unnecessary blank line
> >    staging: greybus: use inline function for macros
> >    staging: greybus: remove unnecessary blank line
> Different patches should have different subject lines.
But I have already the same edit in both file, so should I re-write the 
subject for one of them?
>    You need to either
> be more specific about the file affected or merge the two patches with the
> same subject into one.

each patch related to different file. So, Can I to merge two commits for 
different files but have the same edit in one patch?

but in this case no need to create patchset for all changes in `greybus` 
driver, right?

If okay with that, should I versioning the patches to resend them again, 
or should add "RESEND" subject prefix?

please tell me the best way to resend these patches, appreciate your help.


Menna


> julia
>
> >   drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h                  | 10 ++++++++--
> >   drivers/staging/greybus/greybus_authentication.h |  1 -
> >   drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c                    |  1 -
> >   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1