Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: add nvram function

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:37 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 08:20:55AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:17 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:57:10 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > Add an 'nvram' pattern property and a reference to the corresponding
> > > > SDAM DT schema.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 4 ++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> > >
> > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> > > This will change in the future.
> > >
> > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230320135710.1989-4-johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> >
> > This is a long list of warnings. Can you all fix some of them before
> > adding on to this binding.
>
> Note that this patch is only making the list of warnings shorter so I
> don't think addressing the remaining issues should block this one.

How can you tell sorting thru the 100s of warnings? It sounded like a
new feature to me, not a fix for something missing. Anyways, I've
gotten 2 patches today for this binding and I don't see patches for
fixes. Which is a bit surprising because you all generally are fixing
warnings on the QCom stuff.

I didn't really mean to block this one, but I don't really want to see more.

Rob