Re: [PATCH v5 16/18] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Tue Mar 21 2023 - 09:26:51 EST


On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:17:42PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> +static bool tmigr_inactive_up(struct tmigr_group *group,
> + struct tmigr_group *child,
> + void *ptr)
> +{
> + union tmigr_state curstate, newstate;
> + struct tmigr_walk *data = ptr;
> + bool walk_done;
> + u32 childmask;
> +
> + childmask = data->childmask;
> + newstate = curstate = data->groupstate;
> +
> +retry:
> + walk_done = true;
> +
> + /* Reset active bit when child is no longer active */
> + if (!data->childstate.active)
> + newstate.active &= ~(u8)childmask;
> +
> + if (newstate.migrator == (u8)childmask) {
> + /*
> + * Find a new migrator for the group, because child group
> + * is idle!
> + */
> + if (!data->childstate.active) {
> + unsigned long new_migr_bit, active = newstate.active;
> +
> + new_migr_bit = find_first_bit(&active, BIT_CNT);
> +
> + /* Changes need to be propagated */
> + walk_done = false;

Do you need to propagate the changes even if you found a new migrator for the
group?

> +
> + if (new_migr_bit != BIT_CNT)
> + newstate.migrator = BIT(new_migr_bit);
> + else
> + newstate.migrator = TMIGR_NONE;

Thanks.