Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] x86/mtrr: support setting MTRR state for software defined MTRRs

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:47:30PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Since this code covers TDX guest too, I think eventually it makes sense for TDX
> > guest to use this function too (to avoid #VE IIUC).  If want to do that, then I
> > think TDX guest should have the same mutual understanding with *ALL* hypervisor,
> > as I am not sure what's the point of making the TDX guest's MTRR behaviour
> > depending on specific hypervisor.
> 
> This series tries to fix the current fallout.

We can relax the check so that it runs on TDX too. Along with a comment
above it why it needs to run on TDX.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette