Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device tree binding documentation

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/03/2023 18:57, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> All of these are at the end the
>>> way we can properly match compatible-data to write a proper driver.
>>> The current ralink dtsi files which are in tree now
>>> are totally incomplete and not documented so we are planning to align
>>
>> Nothing like this was said in commit msg, so how can we know?
>>
>>> all of this with openWRT used files and others soon. That's the reason
>>> we are not touching
>>> 'arch/mips/boot/dts' at all now. I don't think anybody is using any of
>>> this but mt7621 which is properly completed and documented.
>>
>> Anyway, none of this explains exception from naming convention - vendor,
>> device or family name.
> 
> Would mediatek,mtmips-clock.yaml make sense?

More, except:
1. This is not clock, but sysc.
2. mips sounds redundant. Do you have rt2xxx and mt7xxx chips which are ARM?

Best regards,
Krzysztof