Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device tree binding documentation

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/03/2023 17:43, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 20.03.2023 19:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/03/2023 17:18, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>>> Adds device tree binding documentation for clocks and resets in the
>>> Mediatek MIPS and Ralink SOCs. This covers RT2880, RT3050, RT3052, RT3350,
>>> RT3883, RT5350, MT7620, MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs.
>>
>> Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (which you can get for
>> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
>> your patch is touching).
>>
>> Subject: drop second/last, redundant "device tree binding
>> documentation". The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these
>> are bindings.
>> (BTW, that's the longest redundant component I ever saw)
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/clock/mtmips-clock.yaml          | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mtmips-clock.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mtmips-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mtmips-clock.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..c92969ce231d
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mtmips-clock.yaml
>>
>> Filename matching compatible, so vendor prefix and device name (or
>> family of names).
> 
> I influenced Sergio to use MTMIPS here as I want to designate it the 
> family name for the MediaTek MIPS and Ralink SoCs.

I don't know how to respond to this. Is it argument for not using naming
style?

> We can't change the 
> compatible string as it's established from my pinctrl patch series we 
> don't do that.

The patch did not say it is documenting existing compatibles in the
kernel DTS. And if we are at this, ralink,rt2880-reset does not look
like single clock nor like clock controller.

Best regards,
Krzysztof