Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] platform/x86: think-lmi: add missing type attribute

[Hans de Goede]

Hi Mark,

It seems that while adding linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx you have dropped
platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. For future patches please Cc both.

platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx needs to be Cc-ed for patches
to show up in patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/platform-driver-x86/list/

Which I use as my primary means of tracking which patches I need
to review / merge (note no need to resend this series I have it
on my radar).

More importantly you seem to not have Cc-ed
Thomas Weißschuh on this version ?

I have added Thomas to the Cc now, so that he can respond to this
version.

Regards,

Hans





On 3/20/23 01:32, Mark Pearson wrote:
> This driver was missing the mandatory type attribute...oops.
> 
> Add it in along with logic to determine whether the attribute is an
> enumeration type or a string by parsing the possible_values attribute.
> 
> Upstream bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216460
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
>  - Unchanged. Sending to linux-kernel mailing list as recommended
> Changes in v3:
>  - Rebased on latest pdx86, review_hans branch
> Changes in v2: 
>  - Simplify the code and move type determination into show function
>  - Don't use Fixes with URL in commit info
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index cc66f7cbccf2..a765bf8c27d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -947,6 +947,20 @@ static ssize_t possible_values_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute
>  	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", setting->possible_values);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t type_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> +		char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct tlmi_attr_setting *setting = to_tlmi_attr_setting(kobj);
> +
> +	if (setting->possible_values) {
> +		/* Figure out what setting type is as BIOS does not return this */
> +		if (strchr(setting->possible_values, ','))
> +			return sysfs_emit(buf, "enumeration\n");
> +	}
> +	/* Anything else is going to be a string */
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "string\n");
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  		struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  		const char *buf, size_t count)
> @@ -1036,10 +1050,13 @@ static struct kobj_attribute attr_possible_values = __ATTR_RO(possible_values);
>  
>  static struct kobj_attribute attr_current_val = __ATTR_RW_MODE(current_value, 0600);
>  
> +static struct kobj_attribute attr_type = __ATTR_RO(type);
> +
>  static struct attribute *tlmi_attrs[] = {
>  	&attr_displ_name.attr,
>  	&attr_current_val.attr,
>  	&attr_possible_values.attr,
> +	&attr_type.attr,
>  	NULL
>  };
>