Re: [PATCH 28/37] drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stat: Convert a couple of doc headers to kerneldoc format

[Harry Wentland]

On 3/20/23 04:19, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 4:23 AM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>>>
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stat.c:38: warning: Cannot understand  *****************************************************************************
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stat.c:76: warning: Cannot understand  *****************************************************************************
>>>
>>> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Mustapha Ghaddar <mghaddar@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@xxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stat.c | 28 +++++++------------
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stat.c
>>> index 6c06587dd88c2..5f6392ae31a66 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stat.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stat.c
>>> @@ -35,19 +35,15 @@
>>>   */
>>>
>>>  /**
>>
>> This looks like it follows some other documentation scheme.  Would
>> probably be better to just remove the extra * and make it not kernel
>> doc.  @Wentland, Harry @Siqueira, Rodrigo ?
> 
> Happy to wait for further input.
> 
> Either demoting from or converting to kerneldoc would be fine.
> 

There's no reason they are formatted the way they are. Converting them to
kerneldoc is fine.

Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>

Harry

>>> - *****************************************************************************
>>> - *  Function: dc_stat_get_dmub_notification
>>> + *  dc_stat_get_dmub_notification
>>>   *
>>> - *  @brief
>>> - *             Calls dmub layer to retrieve dmub notification
>>> + * Calls dmub layer to retrieve dmub notification
>>>   *
>>> - *  @param
>>> - *             [in] dc: dc structure
>>> - *             [in] notify: dmub notification structure
>>> + * @dc: dc structure
>>> + * @notify: dmub notification structure
>>>   *
>>> - *  @return
>>> + * Returns
>>>   *     None
>>> - *****************************************************************************
>>>   */
>>>  void dc_stat_get_dmub_notification(const struct dc *dc, struct dmub_notification *notify)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -73,19 +69,15 @@ void dc_stat_get_dmub_notification(const struct dc *dc, struct dmub_notification
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> - *****************************************************************************
>>> - *  Function: dc_stat_get_dmub_dataout
>>> + * dc_stat_get_dmub_dataout
>>>   *
>>> - *  @brief
>>> - *             Calls dmub layer to retrieve dmub gpint dataout
>>> + * Calls dmub layer to retrieve dmub gpint dataout
>>>   *
>>> - *  @param
>>> - *             [in] dc: dc structure
>>> - *             [in] dataout: dmub gpint dataout
>>> + * @dc: dc structure
>>> + * @dataout: dmub gpint dataout
>>>   *
>>> - *  @return
>>> + * Returns
>>>   *     None
>>> - *****************************************************************************
>>>   */
>>>  void dc_stat_get_dmub_dataout(const struct dc *dc, uint32_t *dataout)
>>>  {
>>> --
>>> 2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
>>>
> 
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]