Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document SM61[12]5 GPU SMMU

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Mar 16 2023 - 15:30:07 EST


On 15/03/2023 11:52, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Both of these SoCs have a Qualcomm MMU500 implementation of SMMU
> in front of their GPUs that expect 3 clocks. Both of them also have
> an APPS SMMU that expects no clocks. Remove qcom,sm61[12]5-smmu-500
> from the "no clocks" list (intentionally 'breaking' the schema checks
> of APPS SMMU, as now it *can* accept clocks - with the current
> structure of this file it would have taken a wastefully-long time to
> sort this out properly..) and add necessary yaml to describe the
> clocks required by the GPU SMMUs.


> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
> + - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
> + - const: qcom,adreno-smmu
> + - const: qcom,smmu-500
> + - const: arm,mmu-500

If you drop the hunk later (from allOf:if), then what clocks do you
expect for non-GPU SMMU?

> + then:
> + properties:
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: mem
> + - const: hlos
> + - const: iface
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: GPU memory bus clock
> + - description: Voter clock required for HLOS SMMU access
> + - description: Interface clock required for register access
> +
> # Disallow clocks for all other platforms with specific compatibles
> - if:
> properties:
> @@ -394,8 +420,6 @@ allOf:
> - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
> - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
> - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
> - - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
> - - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
> - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
> - qcom,sm6375-smmu-500
> - qcom,sm8350-smmu-500
>

Best regards,
Krzysztof