Re: kernel 6.2 stuck at boot (efi_call_rts) on arm64

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 14:50, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:45:49PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 13:50, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 01:43:32PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 13:41, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 13:21, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:34, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:18:21AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 11:03, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > (cc Darren)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 10:45, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:58:20AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Andrea,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 08:54, Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the latest v6.2.6 kernel fails to boot on some arm64 systems, the kernel
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > gets stuck and never completes the boot. On the console I see this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.043484] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.049571] rcu:     22-...0: (30 GPs behind) idle=b10c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=164/164 fqs=6443
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.058520]     (detected by 28, t=15005 jiffies, g=449, q=174 ncpus=32)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.064949] Task dump for CPU 22:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.068251] task:kworker/u64:5   state:R  running task     stack:0     pid:447   ppid:2      flags:0x0000000a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.078156] Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.082595] Call trace:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.085029]  __switch_to+0xbc/0x100
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [   72.088508]  0xffff80000fe83d4c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > After that, as a consequence, I start to get a lot of hung task timeout traces.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried to bisect the problem and I found that the offending commit is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this one:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  e7b813b32a42 ("efi: random: refresh non-volatile random seed when RNG is initialized")
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've reverted this commit for now and everything works just fine, but I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > was wondering if the problem could be caused by a lack of entropy on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > these arm64 boxes or something else.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestion? Let me know if you want me to do any specific test.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is most likely the EFI SetVariable() call going off into the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > weeds and never returning.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this an Ampere Altra system by any chance? Do you see it on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > different types of hardware?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is: Ampere eMAG / Lenovo ThinkSystem HR330a.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you check whether SetVariable works on this system? E.g. by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > updating the EFI boot timeout (sudo efibootmgr -t <n>)?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ubuntu@kuzzle:~$ sudo efibootmgr -t 10
> > > > > > > > > > > > ^C^C^C^C
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ^ Stuck there, so it really looks like SetVariable is the problem.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Could you please share the output of
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > dmidecode -s bios
> > > > > > > > > > > dmidecode -s system-family
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > $ sudo dmidecode -s bios-vendor
> > > > > > > > > > LENOVO
> > > > > > > > > > $ sudo dmidecode -s bios-version
> > > > > > > > > > hve104r-1.15
> > > > > > > > > > $ sudo dmidecode -s bios-release-date
> > > > > > > > > > 02/26/2021
> > > > > > > > > > $ sudo dmidecode -s bios-revision
> > > > > > > > > > 1.15
> > > > > > > > > > $ sudo dmidecode -s system-family
> > > > > > > > > > Lenovo ThinkSystem HR330A/HR350A
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Mind checking if this patch fixes your issue as well?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/commit/?h=altra-fix&id=77fa99dd4741456da85049c13ec31a148f5f5ac0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be enough, I'm still getting the same
> > > > > > > > problem also with this patch applied.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for trying.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How about the last 3 patches on this branch?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=efi-smbios-altra-fix
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actually, that may not match your hardware.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does your kernel log have a line like
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SMCCC: SOC_ID: ID = jep106:036b:0019 Revision = 0x00000102
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ?
> > > > >
> > > > > $ sudo dmesg | grep "SMCCC: SOC_ID"
> > > > > [    5.320782] SMCCC: SOC_ID: ARCH_SOC_ID not implemented, skipping ....
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks. Could you share the entire dmidecode output somewhere? Or at
> > > > least the type 4 record(s)?
> > >
> > > Sure, here's the full output of dmidecode:
> > > https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/4ZmKmP2xTm/
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. I have updated my SMBIOS patches to take the processor version
> > 'eMAG' into account, which appears to be what these boxes are using.
> >
> > I have updated the efi/urgent branch here with the latest versions.
> > Mind giving them a spin?
> >
> >
> > In the mean time, just for the record - could you please run this as well?
> >
> > hexdump -C /sys/firmware/dmi/entries/4-0/raw
> >
> > (as root)
>
> hm.. I don't have that in /sys/firmware/, this is what I have:
>
> # ls -l /sys/firmware/dmi/
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 16 13:26 tables
> # ls -l /sys/firmware/dmi/tables/
> total 0
> -r-------- 1 root root 5004 Mar 16 13:26 DMI
> -r-------- 1 root root   24 Mar 16 13:26 smbios_entry_point
>

You'll need to load the dmi_sysfs module for that. But no big deal
otherwise, I'm pretty sure the word order is the correct on on your
system in any case (it decodes the value correctly in the next line)