Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning

[Raghavendra K T]

On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >   The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning
> > suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3].
> >
> > ...
> >
> >   include/linux/mm.h       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/mm_types.h |  9 +++++++
> >   kernel/fork.c            |  2 ++
> >   kernel/sched/fair.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   mm/memory.c              |  3 +++
>
> It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these.
>
> But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks"
> patchset, and there might be functional issues as well.  So mm.git
> would be the better choice.
>
> Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)?  Hopefully the
> sched developers can take a look and provide feedback.

Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that.