RE: [RFC PATCH v3 15/32] x86/fred: make unions for the cs and ss fields in struct pt_regs

[Li, Xin3]

> >> This causes changes such as the final hunk in patch 27 to read
> >> incorrectly, despite being technically correct.
> >>
> >> cs_slot would be much clearer in code, but tbh, even cs_l would be
> >> better than the version without an underscore.
> >
> >cs_slot sounds a good term unless someone comes up with a better one.
> >
> >>
> >> And obviously, whatever is done here should be mirrored for ss.
> >
> >Probably ss_slot then.
> >  Xin
> >
> 
> I called it csx, for "cs extended". "csq" would work, too.

csx and ssx then.