Re: [syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in jbd2_log_wait_commit

From: syzbot
Date: Tue Feb 28 2023 - 20:46:50 EST

Next message: Herbert Xu: "Re: [v4 PATCH] crypto: stm32 - Save and restore between each request"
Previous message: Herbert Xu: "Re: [v4 PATCH] crypto: stm32 - Save and restore between each request"
In reply to: syzbot: "[syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in jbd2_log_wait_commit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit: e492250d5252 Merge tag 'pwm/for-6.3-rc1' of git://git.kern..
git tree: upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13eff33cc80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ff98a3b3c1aed3ab
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9d16c39efb5fade84574
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12317df8c80000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=150109acc80000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/50a19d2021d0/disk-e492250d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/eb6e11bcecdf/vmlinux-e492250d.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6946b530d74f/bzImage-e492250d.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+9d16c39efb5fade84574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-syzkaller-12944-ge492250d5252 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor109/5071 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88814afd4990 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x146/0x430 fs/jbd2/journal.c:689

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888070a4f780 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
ffff888070a4f780 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ext4_rename+0x1924/0x26d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:3879

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
ext4_rename+0x1924/0x26d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:3879
ext4_rename2+0x1c7/0x270 fs/ext4/namei.c:4193
vfs_rename+0xef6/0x17a0 fs/namei.c:4772
do_renameat2+0xb62/0xc90 fs/namei.c:4923
__do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4956 [inline]
__se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4953 [inline]
__x64_sys_renameat2+0xe8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4953
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x670 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x17b/0x430 fs/jbd2/journal.c:692
jbd2_journal_stop+0x5f5/0xfd0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1959
__ext4_journal_stop+0xe2/0x1f0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:133
ext4_rename+0x1470/0x26d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:4011
ext4_rename2+0x1c7/0x270 fs/ext4/namei.c:4193
vfs_rename+0xef6/0x17a0 fs/namei.c:4772
do_renameat2+0xb62/0xc90 fs/namei.c:4923
__do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4956 [inline]
__se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4953 [inline]
__x64_sys_renameat2+0xe8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4953
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4);
lock(jbd2_handle);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4);
lock(jbd2_handle);

*** DEADLOCK ***

5 locks held by syz-executor109/5071:
#0: ffff88814afd0460 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_renameat2+0x37f/0xc90 fs/namei.c:4859
#1: ffff88814afd0748 (&type->s_vfs_rename_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0x58/0x280 fs/namei.c:2995
#2: ffff888070a4b680 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
#2: ffff888070a4b680 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0x136/0x280 fs/namei.c:3006
#3: ffff888070a4e740 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
#3: ffff888070a4e740 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0x16a/0x280 fs/namei.c:3007
#4: ffff888070a4f780 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
#4: ffff888070a4f780 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ext4_rename+0x1924/0x26d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:3879

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5071 Comm: syz-executor109 Not tainted 6.2.0-syzkaller-12944-ge492250d5252 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/16/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2178
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x670 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x17b/0x430 fs/jbd2/journal.c:692
jbd2_journal_stop+0x5f5/0xfd0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1959
__ext4_journal_stop+0xe2/0x1f0 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:133
ext4_rename+0x1470/0x26d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:4011
ext4_rename2+0x1c7/0x270 fs/ext4/namei.c:4193
vfs_rename+0xef6/0x17a0 fs/namei.c:4772
do_renameat2+0xb62/0xc90 fs/namei.c:4923
__do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4956 [inline]
__se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4953 [inline]
__x64_sys_renameat2+0xe8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4953
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fd5477525c9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe53888c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000013c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd5477960af RCX: 00007fd5477525c9
RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 00007ffe53888c70
R10: 00000000200002c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe53888c6c
R13: 00007ffe53888ca0 R14: 00007ffe53888c80 R15: 0000000000000001
</TASK>

Next message: Herbert Xu: "Re: [v4 PATCH] crypto: stm32 - Save and restore between each request"
Previous message: Herbert Xu: "Re: [v4 PATCH] crypto: stm32 - Save and restore between each request"
In reply to: syzbot: "[syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in jbd2_log_wait_commit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]