Re: [PATCH v7 27/41] x86/mm: Warn if create Write=0,Dirty=1 with raw prot

[Kees Cook]

On February 27, 2023 2:29:43 PM PST, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>When user shadow stack is use, Write=0,Dirty=1 is treated by the CPU as
>shadow stack memory. So for shadow stack memory this bit combination is
>valid, but when Dirty=1,Write=1 (conventionally writable) memory is being
>write protected, the kernel has been taught to transition the Dirty=1
>bit to SavedDirty=1, to avoid inadvertently creating shadow stack
>memory. It does this inside pte_wrprotect() because it knows the PTE is
>not intended to be a writable shadow stack entry, it is supposed to be
>write protected.
>
>However, when a PTE is created by a raw prot using mk_pte(), mk_pte()
>can't know whether to adjust Dirty=1 to SavedDirty=1. It can't
>distinguish between the caller intending to create a shadow stack PTE or
>needing the SavedDirty shift.
>
>The kernel has been updated to not do this, and so Write=0,Dirty=1
>memory should only be created by the pte_mkfoo() helpers. Add a warning
>to make sure no new mk_pte() start doing this.
>
>Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
>Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@xxxxxxx>
>Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
Kees Cook