Re: [PATCH V4 2/8] soundwire: amd: Add support for AMD Manager driver

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

On 2/27/23 10:47, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> AMD ACP(v6.x) IP block has two SoundWire manager devices.
> Add support for
>   - Manager driver probe & remove sequence
>   - Helper functions to enable/disable interrupts,
>     Initialize sdw manager, enable sdw pads
>   - Manager driver sdw_master_ops & port_ops callbacks
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c   | 749 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.h   | 252 ++++++++++
>  include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h |  67 +++
>  3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..63cd8d066602
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,749 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * SoundWire AMD Manager driver
> + *
> + * Copyright 2023 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h>
> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw_registers.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <sound/pcm_params.h>
> +#include <sound/soc.h>
> +#include "bus.h"
> +#include "amd_manager.h"
> +
> +#define DRV_NAME "amd_sdw_manager"
> +
> +#define to_amd_sdw(b)	container_of(b, struct amd_sdw_manager, bus)
> +
> +static void amd_enable_sdw_pads(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
> +{
> +	u32 sw_pad_pulldown_val;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(amd_manager->acp_sdw_lock);
> +	val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_SW_PAD_KEEPER_EN);
> +	val |= amd_manager->reg_mask->sw_pad_enable_mask;
> +	acp_reg_writel(val, amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_SW_PAD_KEEPER_EN);
> +	usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> +
> +	sw_pad_pulldown_val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_PAD_PULLDOWN_CTRL);
> +	sw_pad_pulldown_val &= amd_manager->reg_mask->sw_pad_pulldown_mask;
> +	acp_reg_writel(sw_pad_pulldown_val, amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_PAD_PULLDOWN_CTRL);
> +	mutex_unlock(amd_manager->acp_sdw_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_init_sdw_manager(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 timeout = 0;
> +	u32 retry_count = 0;
> +
> +	acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_ENABLE, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN);
> +	do {
> +		val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN_STATUS);
> +		if (val)
> +			break;
> +		usleep_range(10, 20);
> +	} while (retry_count++ < AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT);
> +
> +	if (retry_count > AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> +	/* SoundWire manager bus reset */
> +	acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_BUS_RESET_REQ, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
> +	val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
> +	while (!(val & AMD_SDW_BUS_RESET_DONE)) {
> +		val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
> +		if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION)
> +			break;
> +		usleep_range(1, 5);
> +		timeout++;
> +	}
> +	if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION)
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;

nit-pick: add a new line here since you're starting a different sequence.

> +	timeout = 0;
> +	acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_BUS_RESET_CLEAR_REQ, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
> +	val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
> +	while (val) {
> +		val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
> +		if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION)
> +			break;
> +		usleep_range(1, 5);
> +		timeout++;
> +	}
> +	if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION) {
> +		dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "Failed to reset SoundWire manager instance%d\n",
> +			amd_manager->instance);
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	}

and same here, this is a new sequence starting here so a newline would help

> +	retry_count = 0;
> +	acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_DISABLE, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN);
> +	do {
> +		val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN_STATUS);
> +		if (!val)
> +			break;
> +		usleep_range(10, 20);
> +	} while (retry_count++ < AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT);
> +
> +	if (retry_count > AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_enable_sdw_manager(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 retry_count = 0;
> +
> +	acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_ENABLE, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN);
> +	do {
> +		val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN_STATUS);
> +		if (val)
> +			break;
> +		usleep_range(10, 20);
> +	} while (retry_count++ < AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT);
> +
> +	if (retry_count > AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	return 0;
> +}

> +static void amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(u32 *low_word, u32 *high_word, u32 cmd_type,
> +				  struct sdw_msg *msg, int cmd_offset)
> +{
> +	u32 low_data = 0, high_data;
> +	u16 addr;
> +	u8 addr_high, addr_low;
> +	u8 data = 0;

nit-pick: this looks a bit messy, usually it's simpler to have
initialized variables on separate lines. If you keep the low and high on
the same line, then at least use the same order.

> +
> +	addr = msg->addr + cmd_offset;
> +	addr_high = (addr & 0xFF00) >> 8;
> +	addr_low = addr & 0xFF;
> +
> +	if (cmd_type == AMD_SDW_CMD_WRITE)
> +		data = msg->buf[cmd_offset];
> +
> +	high_data = FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_DEV_ADDR, msg->dev_num);
> +	high_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_COMMAND, cmd_type);
> +	high_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_REG_ADDR_HIGH, addr_high);
> +	low_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_REG_ADDR_LOW, addr_low);
> +	low_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_REG_DATA, data);
> +
> +	*high_word = high_data;
> +	*low_word = low_data;
> +}
> +
> +static u64 amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, u32 lword, u32 uword)
> +{
> +	u64 resp;
> +	u32 resp_lower, resp_high;

nit-pick: resp_low? you seem to use this low/high pattern in a number of
places.

> +	u32 sts;
> +	u32 timeout = 0;
> +
> +	sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	while (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_CMD_BUSY) {
> +		if (timeout++ > AMD_SDW_RETRY_COUNT) {
> +			dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x previous cmd status clear failed\n",
> +				amd_manager->instance);
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +		usleep_range(5, 10);
> +		sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	}
> +
> +	timeout = 0;
> +	if (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID) {
> +		dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x manager is in bad state\n", amd_manager->instance);
> +		acp_reg_writel(0x00, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	}
> +	acp_reg_writel(uword, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_UPPER_WORD);
> +	acp_reg_writel(lword, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_LOWER_QWORD);
> +
> +	sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	while (!(sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID)) {
> +		if (timeout++ > AMD_SDW_RETRY_COUNT) {
> +			dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x cmd response timeout occurred\n",
> +				amd_manager->instance);
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +		usleep_range(5, 10);
> +		sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	}
> +	resp_high = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_RESP_UPPER_WORD);
> +	resp_lower = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_RESP_LOWER_QWORD);

nit-pick: newline here.

> +	timeout = 0;
> +	acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	while ((sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID)) {
> +		if (timeout++ > AMD_SDW_RETRY_COUNT) {
> +			dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x cmd status retry failed\n",
> +				amd_manager->instance);
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +		usleep_range(5, 10);
> +		sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
> +	}
> +	resp = resp_high;
> +	resp = (resp << 32) | resp_lower;
> +	return resp;
> +}

> +static unsigned int _amd_sdw_xfer_msg(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, struct sdw_msg *msg,
> +				      int cmd, int cmd_offset)
> +{
> +	u64 response;
> +	u32 uword = 0, lword = 0;

couldn't figure out what uword and lword refer to. Is this high/low as
above or something else?

> +
> +	amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(&lword, &uword, cmd, msg, cmd_offset);
> +	response = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lword, uword);
> +	return amd_sdw_fill_msg_resp(amd_manager, msg, response, cmd_offset);
> +}